No Editorial for a Blurred Window

A parochial journal like ours sticks to its values. Strives to be acknowledged as a reliable means of communication. As an opportunity to the members of our university to publish their research. And what are exactly our values?
Fairness as to the intent of the research, good faith, correctness and transparency, curiosity, respect for the subjects and equally for the research team members. All post-Hippocratic principles. But just as afterload includes preload, we know that all the ancient Hippocratic principles are in and observed, and followed.
These lines are intended for our readers and authors to let them know that they are welcome to submit their articles, provided they follow the rules. Medical literature is made to be read, articles to be analyzed, sometimes even quoted. Authors are more or less driven by genuine appetite for research. No matter the driving force, a good outcome is to be expected, utilitarians as we often tend to be.
One of my PhD students confessed recently that the more she was involved, the more she became interested in research. Ideas came as she worked and analyzed results. [More]