Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a common procedure, considered to be a safe alternative to conventional open appendectomy (OA). LA is known to reduce parietal scarring, offers a shortened hospital stay and an earlier return to normal activities. Acute gangrenous and perforated appendicitis may be associated with an increased risk for postoperative complications following laparoscopic appendectomy.
Objective: To determine the complication rate following LA.
Material and methods: Between January 2000 and November 2003, 323 consecutive emergency appendectomies were performed (311 LA, 5 OA and 7 conversions). A retrospective analysis of LA was performed with evaluation of complication rate (fever, pain, intra-abdominal infection or abscess and abdominal wall infection), duration of preceding symptoms, interval between admission and operation, length of the operation, whether the performing surgeon was a resident or a senior surgeon, and the length of hospital stay (LOS).
Results: Two hundred patients (64.3%) were males and mean age was 35 years. Mean waiting time for surgery was 9.4 hours, mean operating time 48 minutes and conversion rate was 2.2%; mean LOS was 3.05 days. Histology showed acute inflammation in 81% (acute appendicitis in 54.34%, phlegomonous appendicitis – 17.36%, perforated or gangrenous appendicitis – 9.00%). There was a 10.6% overall incidence of infectious complications, 9.64% of readmissions and mortality was 0.
Conclusions: It appears that in the current study, the overall complication rate following LA is higher than expected, and tends to be even higher for complicated appendicitis. This needs further evaluation.
Category Archives: AMM 2011, Volume 57, Number 2
Sharing Responsibility Does Not Always Make Things Easier
Positioning of the patient on the operating table is supposed to be a simple task for the operating room team (surgeon, anesthesiologist, circulating nurse and their aids): once anesthesia induction is performed,in the vast majority of cases in the supine position, and surgical procedure is known, it is simple to decide upon the position the patient during operation.
The main factor for deciding upon the position on the operating table is the need to assure an easy surgical access to the anatomic location of the procedure.
But positioning is sometimes accompanied by complications and most of them are related to nerve injuries.
About 15% of anesthetic malpractice claims in the USA refer to nerve injury during operation [1].
There are two main problems related to nerve injuries during surgery and anesthesia.
First is the fact that in most cases the anesthetized patient is unable to complain about pressure or lack of comfort on his or her limbs.
But the worrying aspect of nerve injury during surgery is that it may occur even when all the precautions have
been taken and the impression is that nothing has been left in order to assure a smooth surgical and anesthetic act. [More]
How About Investing a Little Bit More in the Bloody Approach?
Last year Prof Gurman initiated the publication in our journal of a series of happenings in the field of anesthesia
and intensive care. They escalated to an unwanted outcome and the end of every story was decided in the courtroom. This is why the medical cases turned into legal cases.
There is no happy end to a legal case except for the patient to recover and the doctors to acknowledge their good faith and flawless professional behavior. Still, if some wisdom issues from a legal case, there is a positive reflection one can use later on.
The comments an anesthetist would immediately formulate after confrontation with such a case would be self
defendant, and in no case neutral. And the best defense is evidence-based.
When trying to find medical evidence for radial nerve palsy on the net, the first results the Google offered where
583000 entries. When adding anesthesia, the figure dropped to 237000 and further to 2940 if filtered with
an additional noun, positioning. Thus medical literature referring to the reported case is not exotic, and yet few of the titles red and of the articles studied consecutively were relevant to the subject of the research. [More]