Background: Congenital heart disease is currently the world’s leading birth defect, with incidence estimated at 8 per 1000 live births. Confidence in the images obtained using echocardiography has continued to increase, with many patients referred for corrective or palliative surgery on the basis of echocardiographic imaging alone. This review outlines the manner in which echocardiography is used to plan and guide congenital heart surgery or intervention, along with some of the advantages and disadvantages of which to be aware.
Aim: To assess the degree of harmonization of echocardiography with postmortem diagnosis in congenital heart disease.
Material and method: We examined the morphology of congenital heart diseases by autopsy in the Morphopathology Department of the County Hospital of Tîrgu Mureş in 2008 and 2009. We analyzed the components of the congenital heart disease and we compared the echocardiographic results with the autopsy results also.
Results: In 2008 and 2009 621 necropsies were carried out, from which 49, meaning 7.89% were diagnosed with simple or complex cardiac malformations; the male-female ration was 1:0.9. We found a few differences between the echocardiography and autopsy results on the following malformations: total anomalous pulmonary venous connection, double outlet ventricle, univentricular heart.
Conclusions: Echocardiography is accepted as the first-line imaging modality for diagnosing most types of congenital heart defects but in some difficult cases surgeons must always keep in mind the possibility of the presence of other heart malformation too.