Objective: To assess the influence of the identified genotype on the stage of liver fibrosis at hepatitis C identification and at the 5 years follow up.
Methods: In our retrospective study we enrolled 126 patients with Hepatitis C admitted to the Gastroenterology Unit at the Nouvel Hopital Civil in Strasbourg, France between October 2006 and December 2011. All patients had detectable serum HCV-RNA and had not been transplanted during the 5 years surveillance period. The data collected were analyzed with GraphPad Prism Demo for descriptive and inferential statistics and with StatMate2Demo for power analysis.
Results: In our retrospective study we enrolled 126 patients. Genotype distribution was as follows: genotype 1a, n=23 (18.25%); genotype 1b, n=48 (38.10%); genotype 2, n=17 (13.50%); genotype 3, n=18 (14.29%) and genotype 4, n=20 (15.86%). Fibrosis at diagnosis and follow up was not influenced by the genotype (odds ratio ranging from 0.395 to 5.147 but with a 95% CI below 1), except genotype 1b (odds ratio 2.093 [1.008; 4.348] at follow up).
Conclusions: There is no association between a particular HCV genotype and the fibrosis stage as defined by transient elastography.
Tag Archives: fibrosis
Relationship Between Genotypes of Hepatitis C Virus and the Progression to Cirrhosis in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients
Objective: To assess the influence of genotype on the stage of liver fibrosis in case of hepatitis C at the moment of identification and at the 5 years follow-up.
Methods: In our retrospective study we enrolled 126 patients with hepatitis C admitted to the Gastroenterology Unit of the Nouvel Hopital Civil in Strasbourg, France between October 2006 and December 2011. All patients had detectable serum HCV-RNA and had not been transplanted during the 5 years surveillance period. The collected data was analyzed with GraphPad Prism Demo for descriptive and inferential statistics and with StatMate2Demo for power analysis.
Results: Genotype distribution was as follows: genotype 1a, n=23 (18.25%); genotype 1b, n=48 (38.10%); genotype 2, n=17 (13.50%); genotype 3, n=18 (14.29%) and genotype 4, n=20 (15.86%). Fibrosis at diagnosis and follow-up was not influenced by the genotype (odds ratio ranging from 0.395 to 5.147 but with a 95% CI below 1), except genotype 1b (odds ratio 2.093 [1.008; 4.348] at follow-up).
Conclusions: There is no association between a particular HCV genotype and the stage of fibrosis as defined by transient elastography.